Inderpaul Sookraj Solution

*SEC may clamp down on the majority of ERC20 tokens. We're taking systematic measures toward counteracting these risks by adopting the existing circulating cryptocurrency CCB.

All platforms are independent of CCB’s initial distribution, and these platforms will be trading with a third party Cryptocurrency. CCB’s distribution wasn’t distributed in anyway as a security. None of the relative platforms within CCB Org have ever offered a security of any sort, or made announcements relative to CCB’s development or primary distribution.

As separate entities, the SEC cannot interfere with any of our services, as they do not fall within their jurisdiction, and so they shouldn’t. Why should swapping what we produce for what others produce require centralised fiat governance and control?

CCB was selected due to its specific terms of distribution, its circulating volume, its technological fundamentals (CCB is a successor of BTC). These are explained in further detail in the white paper.

*A safe, anti-volatility crypto payment system for e-commerce.

*Point of Sale (POS) interface. Easily downloadable, connecting buyers and merchants allowing purchases of all types with INSTANT transaction confirmation speeds.

*ANAVA (API Network Anti-Volatility & Arbitrage) Trading Bot, essentially an extremely sophisticated trading bot, trades in and out of the subject currency (Crypto Club) and 4 counter pairing assets (BTC, LTC, DASH, XMR) as a network, reducing negative volatility in the subject currency.

*Seuva Bank looks to hold derivative currencies as credit balances, if successfully implement CCB will become the traded ledger of derivative value to Seuva Coin.

*In order for a cryptocurrency network to be truly successful, it requires competitive usability referring to fiat. Until all things from water to land can be accessed without reverting back into fiat, those who control the fiat will control the access to those same basic human rights.

It is a growing belief that the governments do not necessarily have humanity’s best interests in mind, and let’s assume they do, why do those bodies stand as the gatekeepers to surviving and thriving human existence? If the government is for the people, then it need only serve needs of collaboration and consensus. Fair trading has consensus built into it, as fair trade is an enacted consensus.

*The Boring Initiative is the true driving centrifuge of decentralising modes of commerce. Their key focus is on bridging accessibility to necessity resources in exchange for crypto. Their PR project Boring Mart leads their charge, explaining their plan for adoption and how a decentralised currency could reduce unnecessary human waste.

A Bit Essential, A Bit Bazaar, A Bit Delivered & A Bit Escrow are suggested to be affiliated projects. [Learn More]

*Boring Mart is focused on expanding essential access through crypto to the most boring essentials. [Learn More]

*A Bit Bazaar is changing the way people access all things, including crypto. A Bit Bazaar is offering a peer to peer trading platform using CCB. Something like the Alibaba/Ebay of Crypto.

* A Bit Essential will offer peer to peer trades through a separate platform best suited for online groceries, making food and perishables accessible in exchange for crypto. A Bit Essential also plans on being the first online supermarket that connects farmers to the end of the line customers using A Bit Delivered.

* A Bit Delivered has proposed their launch for 2020, delivering perishables from the source to the customers, incentivising localised farming efforts.

The following developments are currently conceptual, yet are proposing to use Seuva Pay Integration.

*Cryptic Spoon The Yelp of Cryptocurrencies

*Byte Spoon A Competitor of Cryptic Spoon

*Escrow Bit Co An Escrow Service for Domain Trading in Cryptocurrencies.